<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micro-segmentation: The basis of niche banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelongtailofbanking.com/2009/12/02/microsegmentation-the-basis-of-niche-banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelongtailofbanking.com/2009/12/02/microsegmentation-the-basis-of-niche-banking/</link>
	<description>Covering the emergence of the niche banking movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nichebanking</title>
		<link>http://thelongtailofbanking.com/2009/12/02/microsegmentation-the-basis-of-niche-banking/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nichebanking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongtailofbanking.com/?p=43#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your comment.  We are actively working to bring this idea of niche banks to life right now, so our goal is to not need an interim solution, but rather to put this in place ASAP.  That said, to your point about using traditional banking and having niche departments, our main concern is in the authenticity that a general traditional bank could achieve in creating meaning experiences for those niches.

One thing to point out (and of course we&#039;ll elaborate more on this in our future posts) is that it&#039;s not the &quot;banking&quot; part of traditional banking we think is broken.  We don&#039;t have a problem with today&#039;s checking accounts or mortgages.  But we have a problem with the &lt;em&gt;delivery&lt;/em&gt; of those products and services.  Therefore, in our minds, it&#039;s the customer experience and delivery of it, that requires our long tail approach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment.  We are actively working to bring this idea of niche banks to life right now, so our goal is to not need an interim solution, but rather to put this in place ASAP.  That said, to your point about using traditional banking and having niche departments, our main concern is in the authenticity that a general traditional bank could achieve in creating meaning experiences for those niches.</p>
<p>One thing to point out (and of course we&#8217;ll elaborate more on this in our future posts) is that it&#8217;s not the &#8220;banking&#8221; part of traditional banking we think is broken.  We don&#8217;t have a problem with today&#8217;s checking accounts or mortgages.  But we have a problem with the <em>delivery</em> of those products and services.  Therefore, in our minds, it&#8217;s the customer experience and delivery of it, that requires our long tail approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oded Levy</title>
		<link>http://thelongtailofbanking.com/2009/12/02/microsegmentation-the-basis-of-niche-banking/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oded Levy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongtailofbanking.com/?p=43#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What you guys bring up here is quite a revolutionary idea, that opposites the centralization trend in the banking industry as reflected by the gigantic banking corps that we all know. Maybe there is an interim solution, which combines the traditional banking with your suggested banking and achieves the same goals. For example, niche departments within the &quot;general&quot; bank or just a better segmentation and original oriented marketing system, that is able to reach people with all kinds of needs.
Do you feel that these solutions are applicable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you guys bring up here is quite a revolutionary idea, that opposites the centralization trend in the banking industry as reflected by the gigantic banking corps that we all know. Maybe there is an interim solution, which combines the traditional banking with your suggested banking and achieves the same goals. For example, niche departments within the &#8220;general&#8221; bank or just a better segmentation and original oriented marketing system, that is able to reach people with all kinds of needs.<br />
Do you feel that these solutions are applicable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nichebanking</title>
		<link>http://thelongtailofbanking.com/2009/12/02/microsegmentation-the-basis-of-niche-banking/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nichebanking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongtailofbanking.com/?p=43#comment-15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question, which brings up an important point.  Rather than get customers, accumulate info about their passions and then market to that (a &quot;push&quot; strategy), we&#039;re doing almost the exact opposite (a &quot;pull&quot; strategy). We are creating something that a certain group of people are passionate about (including us!), even before we have customers at all.  Then, we are joining the communities those people spend time in (these are communities we love as well, because of our shared passion), and letting them come to us if they are attracted to our idea.  So instead of marketing TO customers, we will be interacting with prospective customers who share our passions, and pulling them towards us like a magnet.  Will we be a magnet to everyone who hears about us?  Absolutely not.  But for those who are passionate about the same things we are, we will be a magnet indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, which brings up an important point.  Rather than get customers, accumulate info about their passions and then market to that (a &#8220;push&#8221; strategy), we&#8217;re doing almost the exact opposite (a &#8220;pull&#8221; strategy). We are creating something that a certain group of people are passionate about (including us!), even before we have customers at all.  Then, we are joining the communities those people spend time in (these are communities we love as well, because of our shared passion), and letting them come to us if they are attracted to our idea.  So instead of marketing TO customers, we will be interacting with prospective customers who share our passions, and pulling them towards us like a magnet.  Will we be a magnet to everyone who hears about us?  Absolutely not.  But for those who are passionate about the same things we are, we will be a magnet indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oded Levy</title>
		<link>http://thelongtailofbanking.com/2009/12/02/microsegmentation-the-basis-of-niche-banking/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oded Levy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongtailofbanking.com/?p=43#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very interesting!

The main question is how can the banks accumulate this information about their customers passions? it is not something that you write in your application form...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting!</p>
<p>The main question is how can the banks accumulate this information about their customers passions? it is not something that you write in your application form&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

